A War Like No Other: The Constitution in a Time of Terror by Owen Fiss

By Owen Fiss

Owen Fiss has been a number one criminal student for over 30 years, but sooner than 2001 it is going to have appeared not going for him to put in writing approximately nationwide defense and the legislation of battle; his concentration was once civil method and equivalent defense. yet, while the conflict on Terror started to shroud criminal complaints in secrecy, he realised that the bulwarks of method that protect the person from the amazing energy of the nation have been dissolving. A struggle Like No different can be an important highbrow starting place for all inquisitive about constitutional rights and the legislation in a brand new age.

Show description

Read Online or Download A War Like No Other: The Constitution in a Time of Terror PDF

Similar war books

Just And Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations

From the Athenian assault on Melos to the My Lai bloodbath, from the wars within the Balkans throughout the first battle in Iraq, Michael Walzer examines the ethical concerns surrounding army thought, struggle crimes, and the spoils of conflict. He experiences a number of conflicts over the process background, in addition to the testimony of these who've been so much at once involved--participants, determination makers, and sufferers.

War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution

This ebook is the 1st systematic exam of the effect of reconciliation on restoring and holding peace following civil and overseas conflicts. via 11 comparative case experiences of civil battle and 8 of overseas clash, it constructs a shocking reason for whilst and why reconciliation restores social order.

Additional info for A War Like No Other: The Constitution in a Time of Terror

Example text

The purpose of such extended isolation had long been manifest. In an affidavit filed in open court, Vice Admiral Lowell E. 4 At the time Jacoby swore to the affidavit, Padilla had already been held incommunicado for seven months. According to the government, Padilla was associated with al-Qaeda and was planning to engage in terrorist acts in the United States, including the detonation of a device— known as a dirty bomb—that would disperse radioactive material. The government’s claim was supported by nothing more than an affidavit of an official in the Department of Defense, which contained multiple layers of hearsay.

4 At the time Jacoby swore to the affidavit, Padilla had already been held incommunicado for seven months. According to the government, Padilla was associated with al-Qaeda and was planning to engage in terrorist acts in the United States, including the detonation of a device— known as a dirty bomb—that would disperse radioactive material. The government’s claim was supported by nothing more than an affidavit of an official in the Department of Defense, which contained multiple layers of hearsay.

Accordingly, Hamdi’s claim that he was not an enemy combatant should have been tried by a federal court, not simply because such a court can achieve a measure of neutrality unavailable to a military tribunal but also and more fundamentally because under our constitutional scheme it is the federal judiciary that has the responsibility of determining whether some individual has been deprived of a constitutionally guaranteed right, like the right to freedom. Federal judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, and under our constitutional scheme are endowed with the authority to speak for the nation on the meaning of the Constitution.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.98 of 5 – based on 10 votes